Compare SBIR grant writers and consultants
By GrantWriterMatch Editorial · Updated October 2, 2026
Find paid help for a company-led SBIR or STTR proposal by comparing what a consultant actually offers: planning, coaching, scientific review, full proposal writing, or a combination. The options below have published SBIR/STTR evidence, but their documented services and program coverage differ. Contact the provider you choose to confirm your solicitation, scope, price, and deadline.
Free to compare. No signup to browse. Providers charge for their work.
SBIR/STTR consultants to compare
The list is alphabetical, not a ranking. These are editorial listings, with no active sponsored placement or introduction arrangement. We have not confirmed current project capacity, obtained a quote, or tested a provider's response to an inquiry.
| Provider | Documented buying distinction | Fee information for this work | Direct contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBCetc | SBIR/STTR guidance, proposal preparation support, technical review, and edits. Its detailed service sheet describes reviewing a draft the client supplies. | Quote required; applicable amount and pricing basis not published in the checked service sources. | Contact BBCetc |
| Eva Garland Consulting | Scientific proposal services include full writing and submission. Separate published resources address NIH SBIR/STTR and NSF Phase I; confirm the engagement for your specific program. | Quote required; applicable amount and pricing basis not published in the checked service sources. | Contact Eva Garland Consulting |
| McAllister & Quinn | Its Advanced Technology practice explicitly offers small-business coaching and proposal development that includes SBIR/STTR mechanisms. | Quote required; applicable amount and pricing basis not published in the checked service sources. | Contact McAllister & Quinn |
Sources: BBCetc proposal assistance and service sheet; Eva Garland Consulting proposal services, NIH resource, and NSF resource; McAllister & Quinn Advanced Technology. Checked October 2, 2026.
For a broader project, compare grant-writing services. For the fee calculation and quote comparison, use grant writer costs. You can browse and contact every provider here without answering questions.
What the published evidence establishes
A service being offered does not mean it is included in your quote. An educational resource documents the topic a provider discusses; it does not establish that every related application is accepted or that every consultant has that expertise.
| Provider | Program and phase evidence | Technical or project context | Commercialization support | Budget, registration, and submission support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCetc | SBIR/STTR assistance across participating agencies is stated in its service sheet. Its service page explicitly discusses commercialization content for Phase I and Phase II. Confirm the target agency and assigned consultant. | Technical objectives, hypotheses, and proposal review are covered; your technology's specialist reviewer is not confirmed. | Market-research advice and agency-specific commercialization-content guidance are published. | Budget-support documents and registration/submission guidance are published. The service sheet also describes submission assistance when time permits. |
| Eva Garland Consulting | Published NIH SBIR/STTR guidance; a provider-authored NSF SBIR/STTR book covers Phase I. These resources do not establish a complete agency-by-phase service list. | Scientific proposal support. Its team page lists life sciences, energy/environment, agriculture, information technology, and education; confirm the assigned consultant's fit. | A separate commercialization-plan drafting deliverable is not established by the checked service page; ask what is included. | Registration, budget preparation, full proposal writing, and submission are listed among proposal services. Confirm each for your contract. |
| McAllister & Quinn | SBIR/STTR proposal development is explicit. The checked practice page does not specify an SBIR/STTR agency-by-phase service list. | For-profit technology companies; the practice describes areas including biotechnology, artificial intelligence, defense, and advanced manufacturing. | Technology-development support includes product-roadmap work. A standalone SBIR commercialization-plan deliverable is not confirmed. | The checked practice page does not establish a specific SBIR budget, registration, submission, or scientific-review package. |
Source scope matters: BBCetc's service page and service sheet describe assistance; Eva Garland Consulting's services, team, NIH resource, and NSF book page establish different facts; McAllister & Quinn's practice page documents its broader technology work. Checked October 2, 2026.
Provider details and the questions to ask
BBCetc
Consider contacting BBCetc when your team can produce a technical draft and wants structured SBIR/STTR guidance and review. Its service sheet describes client assessment, training, agency-specific materials, editing, and submission support. The described editing workflow starts with a complete client draft; it should not be read as a promise to write the whole application from scratch.
Its intake page recommends starting 8–12 weeks before the target deadline. For new clients within three weeks, it describes high-level and compliance reviews as workload permits; within ten days, it considers engagements case by case. Those are published timing guidelines, not confirmation that a consultant can take your project.
Price to confirm: the intake page mentions a minimum engagement cost without stating its amount. Ask for that minimum, the fee basis, and the components included in your quote.
Ask BBCetc:
- Will you review our completed draft, help us develop individual sections, or write specified sections yourselves?
- Who will review our technology and proposed experiments for the target agency?
- How many review rounds, budget revisions, and submission checks are included?
- Can the proposed scope be completed by our deadline, and what must we provide first?
Contact BBCetc directly or email info@bbcetc.com. Its contact page also lists 734-930-9741.
Evidence: proposal service sheet, intake expectations, and contact details. Checked October 2, 2026; capacity and current quote not confirmed.
Eva Garland Consulting
Consider contacting Eva Garland Consulting when you want scientific proposal support and need to establish whether a full writing engagement fits your application. Its service page offers funding planning, full proposal writing/submission, scientific review/editing, budget preparation, and registration support. These are available service categories, not a confirmed package for your project.
Its NIH SBIR/STTR resource and NSF Phase I book page establish specific small-business program material. Confirm your agency, phase, technical field, and assigned consultant rather than assuming the same coverage across all mechanisms.
Price to confirm: request a written quote that separates strategic planning, application writing, scientific review, commercialization content, and submission work.
Ask Eva Garland Consulting:
- Can you take our exact solicitation and application pathway, and who would lead the work?
- What scientific material must our team supply before writing starts?
- Will your team draft the commercialization narrative or only review our version?
- Are budget preparation, registrations, submission, and any resubmission included or separately priced?
Contact Eva Garland Consulting directly or email info@evagarland.com. Its meeting page also lists (919) 825-1600.
Evidence: proposal services, the two program resources linked above, and contact details. Checked October 2, 2026; specific project acceptance, capacity, and current quote not confirmed.
McAllister & Quinn
Consider contacting McAllister & Quinn when your small-business proposal is part of a broader technology funding and development strategy. Its Advanced Technology practice lists SBIR/STTR proposal development alongside coaching, strategic intelligence, award support, product-roadmap development, and intellectual-property gap analysis. The work is described as customized to the client.
Price and scope to confirm: ask for the specific application deliverables. The checked practice page does not identify an SBIR/STTR fee, phase list, or complete writing/review/submission package.
Ask McAllister & Quinn:
- Which work would be specific to our SBIR/STTR application, and which belongs to a broader advisory engagement?
- Have the proposed consultants worked with our agency, phase, and technical area?
- Who drafts the technical proposal, commercialization content, and budget?
- Are scientific review, registrations, submission, and post-award services included or separate?
Contact McAllister & Quinn directly. Its contact page provides an inquiry form and (202) 296-2741.
Evidence: Advanced Technology practice and contact page. Checked October 2, 2026; specific project acceptance, capacity, and current quote not confirmed.
Choose the service before comparing the price
An “SBIR consultant” quote can describe very different work. Ask providers to identify the deliverable, who produces the first draft, and what happens after feedback.
| Work you need | Define the purchased deliverable | Confirm before you compare quotes |
|---|---|---|
| Funding fit and planning | A written assessment of your project and target opportunity, with recommended next steps. | Whether it includes eligibility review, a specific solicitation, and a timetable; whether application writing costs extra. |
| Coaching | Scheduled guidance while your team develops the application. | Meeting frequency, feedback format, and whether the consultant writes any sections. |
| Scientific or technical review | Written comments and revisions on an existing draft. | Which sections are reviewed, the reviewer's technical fit, and whether another review round is included. |
| Full proposal development | A defined list of sections the provider drafts from your team's scientific and business information. | First-draft responsibilities, revision rounds, attachments, graphics, page limits, and final approval. |
| Commercialization content | A specified narrative, analysis, or review of your company's path to market. | Who provides market evidence, customer information, revenue assumptions, and any supporting research. |
| Budget and application administration | Identified budget documents, registrations, forms, and submission support. | Who supplies financial inputs, who has submission authority, and who resolves application errors. |
A shorter review engagement and a full writing engagement should not be compared as equivalent purchases. Use the quote comparer to keep known cost, minimum commitment, and unknown extras separate. For an editable scope and comparison worksheet, use the grant writer hiring kit.
Confirm the small-business application you actually have
SBIR/STTR work centers on a small business developing technology with a path toward commercialization. The SBA's program overview explains this focus. A university's research application is not automatically an SBIR/STTR project because its subject is scientific.
At NIH, an STTR application requires a partnership with a nonprofit research institution, while an SBIR application allows a research partnership. The applicant receiving the funding is still the small business. NIH's program comparison explains the differences and application pathways.
Before requesting a quote, identify:
- Applicant: the company applying, plus any research-institution partner.
- Target: the agency, solicitation link, program, phase or pathway, and submission deadline.
- Technology: the problem, proposed innovation, current evidence, and work planned during the project.
- Current materials: existing draft, reviewer feedback, technical data, preliminary budget, and market information.
- Requested scope: planning, coaching, review, drafting, commercialization content, administration, or a defined combination.
If the solicitation is not selected yet, ask for a paid fit-assessment scope rather than a quote that assumes a complete application. If this is an institutional scientific proposal or a different federal program, use the services comparison and confirm the exact mechanism directly.
This page compares hiring options; it does not maintain funding deadlines or confirm that a solicitation is open. Check the issuing agency's current announcement before committing to a project.
Send a useful first inquiry
You can start with a short, nonconfidential project summary. Share unpublished findings, proprietary methods, or detailed intellectual-property information only after agreeing appropriate confidentiality and handling terms with the provider.
We are a U.S. small business developing [brief, nonconfidential technology description]. We are considering [agency, SBIR/STTR program, phase or pathway, and solicitation link] with a target deadline of [date]. We currently have [draft, preliminary data, budget, or other materials]. We want help with [specific deliverables]. Can you confirm your team's fit and capacity, what we must provide, your proposed scope and fee, the minimum commitment, payment schedule, and revision/submission responsibilities?
If you need to compare responses, send the same scope to each provider. Ask for written terms covering ownership of the work, confidentiality, use of subcontractors or AI tools, cancellation, and what happens if you change the target solicitation.
The application remains your organization's responsibility. Buying writing or review support does not guarantee eligibility, a successful submission, a favorable review, or an award.
How this comparison was researched
We used the providers' own service descriptions, program resources, and contact pages. The material sources were reviewed on October 2, 2026. “Published” means the provider states the capability; it does not mean we independently assessed service quality, verified every team credential, or hired the provider.
Unknown fees, specific phase coverage, availability, and inclusions stay unknown. Sources about scientific consulting or broad federal work were not treated as evidence of every SBIR/STTR agency. Educational material is identified separately from contracted service scope. See our methodology for evidence labels and alphabetical ordering, and our advertising disclosure for commercial policies.
If a material detail is wrong or has changed, email partners@grantwritermatch.com with the relevant source. For a hiring inquiry, contact the named provider directly.
Choose a provider and confirm the scope
Start with the consultant comparison, then confirm your specific application and request an itemized quote. You can also browse the broader grant-writer comparison or prepare your brief with the hiring kit.